Coding Agents

Cursor vs GitHub Copilot

TL;DR

How Cursor and GitHub Copilot compare on real-world demand, licensing, adoption and positioning — straight from the Agent Reality Index.

Agent Reality Index

Cursor #1 in Coding Agents · 84.8 / 100 GitHub Copilot #3 in Coding Agents · 78.3 / 100

Dimension	Cursor	GitHub Copilot
Agent Reality Index	84.8 / 100 (#1)	78.3 / 100 (#3)
Monthly search demand	~310k/mo	~110k/mo
Licensing	Proprietary / closed-source	Proprietary / closed-source
Developer adoption	No public repo	No public repo
Positioning	Autonomous · Editor-integrated	Assistive · Editor-integrated

The verdict

Cursor leads GitHub Copilot on the Agent Reality Index (84.8 vs 78.3), driven mainly by stronger real-world search demand — the heaviest factor in the index. GitHub Copilot remains a credible choice where its positioning fits your workflow better; the row above shows where the two diverge.

Figures auto-generated from the Agent Reality Index and refreshed monthly. How the index is built →

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Cursor and GitHub Copilot?

How Cursor and GitHub Copilot compare on real-world demand, licensing, adoption and positioning — straight from the Agent Reality Index.

Is Cursor or GitHub Copilot better?

How do Cursor and GitHub Copilot compare on the Agent Reality Index?

On the Agent Reality Index, Cursor scores 84.8 of 100 (ranked #1 in Coding Agents) and GitHub Copilot scores 78.3 of 100 (#3 in Coding Agents). The index weights real-world demand most heavily and refreshes monthly.