Coding Agents

Cursor vs Devin

How Cursor and Devin compare on real-world demand, licensing, adoption and positioning — straight from the Agent Reality Index.

Dimension Cursor Devin
Agent Reality Index 98.8 / 100 (#1) 83.3 / 100 (#2)
Monthly search demand ~368k/mo ~29k/mo
Licensing Proprietary / closed-source Proprietary / closed-source
Developer adoption No public repo No public repo
Positioning Autonomous · Editor-integrated Autonomous · Standalone / CLI

The verdict

Cursor leads Devin on the Agent Reality Index (98.8 vs 83.3), driven mainly by stronger real-world search demand — the heaviest factor in the index. Devin remains a credible choice where its positioning fits your workflow better; the row above shows where the two diverge.

Figures auto-generated from the Agent Reality Index and refreshed monthly. How the index is built →

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Cursor and Devin?

How Cursor and Devin compare on real-world demand, licensing, adoption and positioning — straight from the Agent Reality Index.

Is Cursor or Devin better?

Cursor leads Devin on the Agent Reality Index (98.8 vs 83.3), driven mainly by stronger real-world search demand — the heaviest factor in the index. Devin remains a credible choice where its positioning fits your workflow better; the row above shows where the two diverge.

How do Cursor and Devin compare on the Agent Reality Index?

On the Agent Reality Index, Cursor scores 98.8 of 100 (ranked #1 in Coding Agents) and Devin scores 83.3 of 100 (#2 in Coding Agents). The index weights real-world demand most heavily and refreshes monthly.

Is your organisation ready for AI agents?

Take the assessment →